War of Terror
Coalition to Govern America header with logo
Wednesday, November 20th, 2019

We have 501 guests and no members online

Watchdog Whistleblower: OPCW Put Lid on Key Evidence in Syria's Douma Chemical Incident

 
Fars News Agency
October 25, 2019
 
TEHRAN (FNA)- The international chemical weapons watchdog likely skewed its own investigation of the 2018 chemical weapons incident in Douma, Syria, to come to a predetermined decision, a damning conclusion based on whistleblower testimony said.

The April 2018 incident in the Damascus suburb was quickly blamed on the Syrian government by the West. Within days, the US, the UK and France launched barrages of cruise missiles in retaliation. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the international chemical weapons watchdog, later backed the justification, all but pointing the finger at Syria in its final report, which was released in March, RT reported.

Now a panel of experts says the report was based on a flawed conclusion and likely deliberately steered toward the West-favored outcome. The accusation is based on evidence and testimony of an OPCW investigator, who came forward with damning evidence that his own organization had breached its mission.

After talking to the whistleblower and examining internal reports, text exchanges and other evidence, the panel was convinced that “key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion”, it announced in a statement.

The statement added that the OPCW took effort to exclude dissenting investigators and silence their attempts to raise concerns about the report, which is “a right explicitly conferred on inspectors in the Chemical Weapons Convention”.

The experts called on the organization to revisit its investigation and allow those not agreeing with the conclusion put in the final report to voice their concerns without fear of reprisal.

The panel convened by the Courage Foundation, which accepts donations for the legal defense of whistleblowers and journalists that report on leaks, includes several prominent specialists and public figures, including José Bustani, a Brazilian diplomat who served as the OPCW’s first Director General before being strong-armed from the office by US superhawk John Bolton.

Bustani stated that the whistleblower confirmed his doubts about the report, which “seemed incoherent at best” right from the start.

“My hope is that the concerns expressed publicly by the Panel, in its joint consensus statement, will catalyze a process by which the Organization can be resurrected to become the independent and non-discriminatory body it used to be,” Bustani added.

The panel did not make public the name of the whistleblower or any previously unpublished evidence of the OPCW’s alleged misconduct.

WikiLeaks, whose editor-in-chief Kristinn Hrafnsson was a member of the panel, re-printeda draft engineering assessment penned by an OPCW investigator, which was leaked in May. The document rejects the claim that chlorine cylinders, which were used for delivery of the toxic gas in Douma, had been dropped from the air, which was used as a key argument in accusing the Syrian Army for the attack.

The OPCW did not challenge the authenticity of the document, but stood by its conclusions on the Douma incident.

This article first appeared at Fars News Agency, and has been republished here with permission.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Govern America Radio

"Truth for the Restoration of Our Nation"
 

CURRENTLY ON AIR:
Loading

Listen to Govern America
Saturdays at 11AM-2PM Eastern

LISTEN LIVE

ARCHIVES & PODCAST

Govern America playlist of latest episodes

Popular from this Category